Final Boss Form

The chart showed that the percentage of time we were spending online was increasing hugely, but the percentage of ad dollars wasn’t close to catching up yet. “This will obviously correct over time,” the Yahoo executive would say, and Yahoo was the biggest trove of eyeballs on the Web, hence Yahoo would benefit. Ta da! There was no problem. It was just a matter of time–if everyone would wait a few years, it would happen on its own.

So we waited.

And waited.

And nearly a decade later, and we’re still waiting. In fact, in corners of the Valley, you still hear the same sad, hopeful argument.

It’s time we faced it: Digital ad spend is nowhere close to reflecting the amount of time we spend online. Move to plan B, Internet economy, because this one just isn’t happening on its own.

That’s because there was a fundamental flaw in the Silicon Valley premise that anyone on Madison Avenue could explain: Attention doesn’t equal a good advertising opportunity. That has never been the case in the offline world, so it’s perplexing that the brightest minds in Silicon Valley would think all eyeballs are equal. Since when did an hour with a magazine get priced on the same scale as a 3 second drive-by of a billboard?

We’re Still Waiting For Internet Ad Spend To Catch Up to the Web–Let’s Not Make The Same Mistake With Mobile | PandoDaily

This, in a nutshell, is what we’re trying to do at Tumblr. We’re not trying to go after the money that Facebook and Twitter and Google have gotten from TV. We’re trying to go after the money that is still in TV - some $59 billion.

That money is still in TV because it’s the only place a brand can do something emotional. The web is more than small boxes, clicks and numbers.

(via rickwebb)

Reblogging just so that I can embiggen and embolden Rick’s comment.

It’s also why, as a fandom architect of sorts, Tumblr excites me more than Facebook, Twitter, or (soulless) Pinterest do.